There
are several vital qualities a Cross Athlete (Ski and Boardercross) must possess
to consistently be a top performer from race to race. Strength, balance, endurance, power,
quickness/agility, technical skills and mental focus are a few of the more
obvious. Becoming faster and quicker
over features on the racecourse is a common result that athletes I train want
to gain from their off-season gym work.
PHOTO VAST:: vastaction.com |
These
athletes at first are a little surprised when I prescribe a steady diet of
weight training for strength and size before we come close to doing anything
that even remotely resembles traditional speed/agility-style training.
With the technical nature of most Cross Courses it’s easy to understand a competitor’s desire to move more quickly. For example, the quicker you are, the better you’ll be able to handle features throughout a start section, which means more distance between you and the competition. To get a better idea of technical course design, check out this video from Nick Langkamp’s POV during a practice run at the US Grand Prix at the Canyons, Utah form earlier this year:
Thinking you need to be faster and wanting to be faster are both acceptable
ideas. The problem is that most athletes
lack the baseline level of strength required to make their bodies move
faster. As a result, no amount of speed
training will improve their quickness.
This also applies to athletes born with the gift of amazing quickness (assuming there is no effort to develop strength levels throughout their career). Though at first they may be faster than everyone else in their peer group, eventually these gifted athletes will arrive at a competition level where all the other competitors are just as nimble or faster than they are and unless they improve their ability to move quickly, will no longer be winning races.
It’s
amazing how identical they look through the start section. Timing, technique, etc. is almost exactly the
same. How do you gain an advantage (set
aside the possibility of help from gate selection and on-course mistakes) in a
group like this? Simple. The rider with more physical strength will
always have the upper hand.
It might help to understand a basic description of moving quickly:
It might help to understand a basic description of moving quickly:
Quickness/Agility is the result of being able to
powerfully and efficiently apply force to the ground (often repeatedly and/or
in rapid succession)
The
only way to increase this application of force is with improved strength. Without the strength to sufficiently apply
force or handle the sudden change of directions involved with speed training,
an athlete won’t get the desired benefit from the exercises. You can’t just “will” yourself to apply more
force (and become quicker).
So
the secret (and usually the only way for most) to becoming faster/quicker is to
first get stronger (and to some degree bigger).
Any off-season training program that doesn’t address strength/size first
won’t produce results in speed/quickness later.
Getting Stronger to Move Faster |
The following scenario is typical in terms of results one experiences from trying to improve
quickness with just speed/agility training (no effort to develop appropriate
strength first):
- The athlete starts a speed training program and
learns/practices several quickness drills/challenges during each workout. Over a few weeks they usually have some
perceived improvement in the gym training sessions with regards to
quickness. They keep up with their speed
training and fail to show continued or real improvement with the original
exercises/drills.
They
may or may not see any of these efforts translate to their on-snow
performance. Though they may experience
slight progress with regard to quickness in competitions, it won’t be enough to
show a dramatic difference from the previous season’s performance.
The
main reason the athlete ‘improved’ initially in the gym setting is that they
learned how to do the specific exercises in the training sessions. If you try a certain training challenge that
you’ve never done before and then try it again a week later, after having
practiced the movements, you will automatically perform that same training
challenge better and in a faster time - you didn’t get ‘faster’, you only got
smarter. Unfortunately, unless there’s a
new base level of strength to draw from, that’s where the speed progress ends.
If
you have a coach who is leading you through a similar process as to what I
described, my guess is every other week, they change up the ‘speed’ exercises
you perform and you start that process over.
Unfortunately you might think you’re getting quicker (because with each
new set of exercises you show initial improvement compared to the first time
you do them), but again you’re just learning to do the exercises better.
If you want to become more agile and quick, I propose that you choose 4 speed drills and do them this week to get a baseline performance time for each. Obviously take the time to learn them first, don’t just do them once and that’s it. These instructions seem to go against everything I've just talked about in this article, but again, I really just want you to have a baseline time ‘standard’ for the exercises to compare to at a later date.
If you want to become more agile and quick, I propose that you choose 4 speed drills and do them this week to get a baseline performance time for each. Obviously take the time to learn them first, don’t just do them once and that’s it. These instructions seem to go against everything I've just talked about in this article, but again, I really just want you to have a baseline time ‘standard’ for the exercises to compare to at a later date.
After that, spend the next 8 weeks in an
intensive strength-training program under the guidance of an experienced
Coach. Take a few days off, then do the
original 4 speed drills again and see if your times are better. As with the first time you did them, give
yourself a chance to get re-acquainted with the drills before judging your
times. I guarantee that your performance
will improve significantly. The funny
thing is if you had spent those 8 weeks just doing the same speed drills over and over, there’d be very little improvement, but you would have been thinking that
you’re “working on your quickness and agility” the whole time.
Weights Held Overhead Help Build Body Armor |
Besides
an ability to improve quickness, increases in strength (and size) also have
other positive benefits for the Cross Athlete:
-
More
explosive, powerful pulls out of the starting gate
-
Strength
to handle the forces in high-speed banked turns (easier to stay on your line in
tight races, etc.) and the extreme forces involved in absorbing landings
-
Increased
power applied to (and acceleration from) pumping features
-
Your
own body armor (yes, muscle is body armor)
The
US Team riders are using strength/weight training to gain a competitive
advantage, why not you? Here’s a look
at a portion of the gym at the USSA Center of Excellence in Utah (1).
Looks
like they might lift some weights there, eh?
And if you still don’t think it’s worth putting in time to get stronger,
check out some stats on the US SBX “A” Team:
- Nick
Baumgartner – Height: 6’ – Weight: 205#
- Seth
Wescott – Height: 6’1” – Weight: 195#
- Nate
Holland – Height: 5’10” – Weight: 185#
- Jonathan
Cheever – Height: 5’10” – Weight: 185#
Even
though these guys are at the top of the SBX game, if you didn’t know who they
were, you would easily believe me if I told you they were pros from an NHL
hockey club.
Weight Training = Smiles |
If you’re not already doing so, I urge you to
get started on a basic strength/muscle building program right now as part of
your off-season training under the guidance of an experienced Coach. Don’t wait!
There’s still plenty of time before snow season to make significant
gains in your overall strength. Once
you’ve built that new base level of strength you can add some speed work to the
routine.
You’ll
be thanking me from the podium next winter.
Coach Jb
1 - Baker,
David. "USSA Center for Excellence." What's Up USANA? 06/21/2012. Viewed 05/27/13 http://whatsupusana.com/2012/07/ussas-troy-flanagan-sports-science-problem-solver/
No comments:
Post a Comment